Category Archives: Bail Bonds

Bail Bonds

The Internet Risks With Social Networking Sites

Internet-based social networking sites have created a revolution in social connectivity. However, con artists, criminals, and other dishonest actors are exploiting this capability for nefarious purposes.

There are primarily two tactics used to exploit online social networks. In practice, they are often combined.

FBI

FBI

1. Computer savvy hackers who specialize in writing and manipulating computer code to gain access or install unwanted software on your computer or phone.

2. Social or human hackers who specialize in exploiting personal connections through social networks. Social hackers, sometimes referred to as “social engineers,” manipulate people through social interactions (in person, over the phone, or in writing).

Humans are a weak link in cyber security, and hackers and social manipulators know this. They try to trick people into getting past security walls. They design their actions to appear harmless and legitimate.

Falling for an online scam or computer hack could be damaging for an individual victim as well as the organization the victim works for. Such risks include:

frustrated man at the computerVulnerability of Social Networking Sites

Social networking sites are Internet-based services that allow people to communicate and share information with a group.

Risks:

Once information is posted to a social networking site, it is no longer private. The more information you post, the more vulnerable you may become. Even when using high security settings, friends or websites may inadvertently leak your information.

Personal information you share could be used to conduct attacks against you or your associates. The more information shared, the more likely someone could impersonate you and trick one of your friends into sharing personal information, downloading malware, or providing access to restricted sites.

Predators, hackers, business competitors, and foreign state actors troll social networking sites looking for information or people to target for exploitation.

Information gleaned from social networking sites may be used to design a specific attack that does not come by way of the social networking site.

Tactics:

Baiting – Someone gives you a USB drive or other electronic media that is preloaded with malware in the hope you will use the device and enable them to hack your computer.

Do not use any electronic storage device unless you know its origin is legitimate and safe. Scan all electronic media for viruses before use.

Click-jacking – Concealing hyperlinks beneath legitimate clickable content which, when clicked, causes a user to unknowingly perform actions, such as downloading malware, or sending your ID to a site. Numerous click-jacking scams have employed “Like” and “Share” buttons on social networking sites. Disable scripting and iframes in whatever Internet browser you use. Research other ways to set your browser options to maximize security.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) – Malicious code is injected into a benign or trusted website. A Stored XSS Attack is when malicious code is permanently stored on a server; a computer is compromised when requesting the stored data. A Reflected XSS Attack is when a person is tricked into clicking on a malicious link; the injected code travels to the server then reflects the attack back to the victim’s browser. The computer deems the code is from a “trusted” source.

Turn off “HTTP TRACE” support on all webservers. Research additional ways to prevent becoming a victim of XSS.

Doxing – Publicly releasing a person’s identifying information including full name, date of birth, address, and pictures typically retrieved from social networking site profiles.

Be careful what information you share about yourself, family, and friends (online, in print, and in person).

Elicitation – The strategic use of conversation to extract information from people without giving them the feeling they are being interrogated. Be aware of elicitation tactics and the way social engineers try to obtain personal information.

Pharming – Redirecting users from legitimate websites to fraudulent ones for the purpose of extracting confidential data. (E.g.: mimicking bank websites.)

Watch out for website URLs that use variations in spelling or domain names, or use “.com” instead of “.gov”, for example. Type a website’s address rather than clicking on a link.

Example:
Most computer infections come from websites. Just visiting a website can expose your computer to malware even if you do not download a file or program. Often legitimate sites may be unknowingly infected. Websites with information on popular celebrities or current sensational news items are frequently hijacked by criminals, or criminals may create such websites to lure victims to them.

Phishing – Usually an email that looks like it is from a legitimate organization or person, but is not and contains a link or file with malware. Phishing attacks typically try to snag any random victim. Spear phishing attacks target a specific person or organization as their intended victim.

Do not open email or email attachments or click on links sent from people you do not know. If you receive a suspicious email from someone you know, ask them about it before opening it.

Example:
In March 2011, hackers sent two spear phishing emails to a small group of employees at security firm, RSA. They only needed one employee to open an infected file and launch the malware. The malware downloaded information from RSA that then helped the hackers learn how to defeat RSA’s security token. In May and June 2011, a number of defense contractors’ networks were breached via the compromised RSA token.

Phreaking – Gaining unauthorized access to telecommunication systems.

Do not provide secure phone numbers that provide direct access to a Private Branch Exchange or through the Public Branch Exchange to the public phone network.

Scams – Fake deals that trick people into providing money, information, or service in exchange for the deal.

If it sounds too good to be true, it is most likely a scam. Cybercriminals use popular events and news stories as bait for people to open infected email, visit infected websites, or donate money to bogus charities.

Example:
Before the 2010 World Cup, cybercriminals offered tickets for sale or sent phishing emails claiming you won tickets to see the event.

After the death of Osama Bin Laden, a video claiming to show Bin Laden’s capture was posted on Facebook. The video was a fake. When users clicked on the link to the video, they were told to copy a JavaScript code into their browser bar which automatically sent the hoax to their friends, and gave the hackers full access to their account.

Spoofing – Deceiving computers or computer users by hiding or faking one’s identity. Email spoofing utilizes a sham email address or simulates a genuine email address. IP spoofing hides or masks a computer’s IP address.

Know your co-workers and clients and beware of those who impersonate a staff member or service provider to gain company or personal information.

Preventive Measures at Work:

“Defense in Depth” – use multiple layers of security throughout the computer network.
Identify ways you have lost data in the past, and mitigate those threats. Educate employees about those threats and how to change their behavior, if necessary, to prevent future loss.
Constantly monitor data movement on your network.
Establish policies and procedures for intrusion detection systems on company networks.
Establish policies about what company information can be shared on blogs or personal social web pages. Enforce the policy.
Educate employees about how their own online behavior could impact the company.
Provide yearly security training.
Ask employees to report suspicious incidents as soon as possible.

Additional Preventive Measures:

Do not store any information you want to protect on any device that connects to the Internet.
Always use high security settings on social networking sites, and be very limited in the personal information you share. Monitor what others are posting about you on their online discussions.
Use anti-virus and firewall software. Keep them and your browser, and operating systems patched and updated.
Change your passwords periodically, and do not reuse old passwords. Do not use the same password for more than one system or service. For example, if someone obtains the password for your email, can they access your online banking information with the same password?
Do not post anything that might embarrass you later, or that you don’t want strangers to know.
Verify those you correspond with. It is easy for people to fake identities over the Internet.
Do not automatically download, or respond to content on a website or in an email. Do not click on links in email messages claiming to be from a social networking site. Instead go to the site directly to retrieve messages.
Only install applications or software that come from trusted, well-known sites. “Free” software may come with malware. Verify what information applications will be able to access prior to enabling them. Once installed, keep it updated. If you no longer use it, delete it.
Disable Global Position System (GPS) encoding. Many digital cameras encode the GPS location of a photo when it is taken. If that photo is uploaded to a site, so are the GPS coordinates, which will let people know that exact location.
Whenever possible, encrypt communications with websites. It may be a feature social network sites allow you to enable.
Avoid accessing your personal accounts from public computers or through public WiFi spots.
Beware of unsolicited contacts from individuals in person, on the telephone, or on the Internet who are seeking corporate or personal data.
Monitor your bank statements, balances, and credit reports.
Do not share usernames, passwords, social security numbers, credit cards, bank information, salaries, computer network details, security clearances, home and office physical security and logistics, capabilities and limitations of work systems, or schedules and travel itineraries.

No legitimate service or network administrator will ask you for your password.

Do not provide information about yourself that will allow others to answer your security questions—such as when using “I forgot my password” feature.
Be thoughtful and limit personal information you share such as job titles, locations, hobbies, likes and dislikes, or names and details of family members, friends, and co-workers.

Educational Resources:

A number of organizations and websites provide additional details on how to protect you and your workplace from social networking threats.

www.LooksTooGoodToBeTrue.com
www.OnGuardOnline.gov
www.us-cert.gov
www.ic3.gov
www.dhs.gov
www.ftc.gov
www.fbi.gov

$50,000 Reward for Help with Mayan Club Shooting

Mayan Club Shooting

Los Angeles: Detectives released video of two suspects from a January 2012 murder in downtown Los Angeles and announced a $50,000 reward sponsored by District 9 Los Angeles City Councilmember Jan Perry in an effort to identify the two key suspects.

Mayan Club Shooting

Mayan Club Shooting

On Jan. 28, 2012, as patrons spilled out of two downtown nightclubs, two groups of men got in an argument on the sidewalk. Their encounter escalated into a shooting during which four men were shot and one died at the intersection of Hill Street and Olympic Boulevard.

“This literally started over one guy bumping into another guy on the sidewalk,” said Detective Thayer Lake, lead detective for the investigation out of the LAPD Central Detective Division. “By all accounts, this was testosterone and liquor driven and never had to happen.”

Fernando Hernandez, 23, of Culver City was one of four men shot that night. He died of a head wound. The other three men recovered.

In spite of dozens of witnesses, no one has come forward with names of the shooters. Detectives have pored over video footage from the area and interviewed witnesses. “We’ve narrowed down the investigation to two men seen walking in a video with two women in front of the Mayan night club on Hill Street,” Detective Lake explained. “We need someone to come forward and tell us who these two men are.”

The resulting charges are most likely three counts of attempted murder and murder. According to the bail schedule for Los Angeles bail, PC 664/187, the bail amount will most likely be $500K or $1M. When working with a Los Angeles Bail Bonds company, the fee is 10%. That would be $50K or $100K. The defendant could also get additional charges like concealing a weapon and an unregistered weapon which could add to the total bail amount. Normally for a bail this size sufficient collateral would be required. For bail at $1M, they would need property with equity equaling the $1M.

**Video footage of the suspects is available at www.lapdtv.org or by recording from monitors at LAPD’s Central Police Station.**

Anyone with information on this crime is urged to call LAPD Central Homicide Unit Detective Thayer Lake at 213-972-1254. Anonymous tips can be called into Crime Stoppers at 800-222-TIPS (8477) or by texting 274637 (C-R-I-M-E-S on most keypads) with a cell phone. All text messages should begin with the letters “LAPD.” Online tips may be placed at www.LAPDOnline.org by clicking on “webtips” and following the prompts.

Armed Man Threatens Family and Officers

Los Angeles: A man threatening family members with a knife pointed a handgun at responding officers and an officer involved shooting occurred, killing the suspect.

On March 24, 2012, at 6 p.m., North Hollywood Area officers responded to a radio call of a man armed with a knife and causing a disturbance in the 7400 block of Craner Avenue. Arriving officers were told by witnesses the suspect, 35-year-old Benjamin Bittner, had barricaded himself inside the residence and was armed with a handgun.

While officers were awaiting the arrival of LAPD SWAT and K-9 resources, around 6:30 p.m. Bittner came out of the house armed with a handgun. An officer involved shooting occurred and Bittner was struck by gunfire.

Los Angeles Fire Department responded and transported Bittner to a local hospital where he was pronounced dead. None of the four involved officers were injured. A replica handgun, resembling a Colt 1911, was recovered at scene.

Force Investigation Division Detectives responded and are investigating the officer involved shooting. The investigation will ultimately be reviewed by the Office of the Chief of Police, the Office of the Inspector General and Board of Police Commissioners for compliance with the Department’s use-of-force policy, which states that an officer’s use-of-force actions must be objectively reasonable.

Anyone with information about this incident is urged to call the FID at 213-486-5230. Anonymous tips can be called into Crime Stoppers at 800-222-TIPS (8477) or by texting 274637 (C-R-I-M-E-S on most keypads) with a cell phone. All text messages should begin with the letters “LAPD.” Online tips may be placed at www.LAPDOnline.org by clicking on “webtips” and following the prompts.

Developer Arrested in Mortgage Fraud Scheme

United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced the arrest today of Aruna Kumari Chopra, 63, of Modesto. A federal grand jury returned an indictment against her on March 15, 2012, charging her with two counts of mail fraud and two counts of aggravated identity theft. The indictment was unsealed following her arrest.

According to the indictment, in 2009, Chopra purchased property at 4754 Dale Road in Modesto. She sought to finance the development of the property by trying to convince the city of Modesto to put into place a Communities Funding District that would issue bonds for infrastructure improvements. She allegedly concealed from the city of Modesto that there were pre-existing liens on the property. She also allegedly provided the City of Modesto with fictitious contracts of potential sales of a fully developed property to support a higher appraisal of the property. The indictment alleges that Chopra attempted to defraud other lenders, including the persons who sold her the property, by filing documents with the Stanislaus County Recorder’s Office that contained forged signatures. She is charged with aggravated identity theft for two instances when she allegedly forged the signature and used the seal of a notary public on a publicly filed document.

This case is the product of an extensive investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Stanislaus County District Attorney’s Office; and the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Office of Inspector General, working with the San Joaquin Valley Mortgage Fraud Task Force. The U.S. Attorney and the FBI created the San Joaquin Valley Mortgage Fraud Task Force in 2009 to further the prosecution of mortgage fraud cases arising out of the southern half of the Central Valley. Assistant United States Attorney Mark J. McKeon is prosecuting the case.

If convicted, Chopra faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count of mail fraud, and she faces a mandatory penalty of two years in prison on each count of aggravated identity theft, which must run consecutive to any other sentence. The actual sentence, however, will be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory sentencing factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables.

The charges are only allegations and the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Mortgage fraud is a priority area for the President’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. For more information on the task force, visit StopFraud.gov.

Sacramento Man Arrested for Sharing Child Pornography

SACRAMENTO—United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced that last week, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment charging Darren L. Brown, 47, of Sacramento, with sharing and receiving child pornography. He was arrested on Monday.

According to the indictment, from September to October 2011, Brown traded images via the Internet that depicted the sexual exploitation of children.

On Monday, March 19, 2012, Brown was arraigned before United States Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Brown pleaded not guilty and was released on a $25,000 bond with restrictions placed on his access to computers and children. His next court appearance is scheduled for April 23, 2012 before United States District Judge William B. Shubb.

Sacramento Bail Bonds: A $25,000 bail bonds can be dealt with in two ways; One, the defendant can take $25K in cash directly to the court, the $25K will be returned to the defendant once the case is finished, two; use a bail bonds company to put up the bond for him. The defendant would only need $2500 to follow this process. The $2500 is a fee given to the bail bonds company and is non-refundable. The fee is similar to the fee given to a broker to brokering a loan and the bail bonds is actually similar to a loan. A contract is signed and the defendant is responsible for the entire amount until the case is finished. Its interesting to note that the California Bail Schedule shows the PC 311.11(a) at $20K and the total bail reported here is $25K.

This case is the product of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Morris is prosecuting the case.

If convicted, Brown faces a maximum statutory penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of at least five years in prison. The actual sentence, if convicted, will be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables.

The charge is only an allegation, and the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) in the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to better locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov or call the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California and ask to speak with the PSC coordinator.

San Bernardino School Teacher Arrested for Child Pornography

San Bernardino, CA—A former San Bernardino middle school teacher was arrested this morning on charges he exchanged sexually explicit images online with a 13-year-old girl, announced Steven Martinez, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office; and André Birotte Jr., the United States attorney in Los Angeles. The announcement was made on behalf of multiple law enforcement agencies investigating the case in California and New Jersey.

Eugene Ballantyne, 29, of Running Springs, California, was arrested this morning without incident by FBI agents. A criminal complaint was filed in United States District Court in Riverside on Friday charging Ballantyne with receipt and distribution of child pornography, a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2252A(a)(2).

According to the complaint, detectives with the South Brunswick Police Department in New Jersey were contacted by a parent of a 13-year old-girl, the alleged child victim identified in the complaint as “CV,” after the parent had become aware of sexually explicit communication between the victim and Ballantyne earlier this year. South Brunswick detectives continued to investigate and contacted the FBI when their investigation revealed the victim had been corresponding with a suspect located in California.

San Bernardino Bail Bonds

San Bernardino Bail Bonds

Investigators in New Jersey and California, with the assistance of the San Bernardino School District, identified Eugene Ballantyne as the user of the phone used to communicate with the minor victim.

According to the complaint, Ballantyne met the victim on an Internet chat site where they exchanged contact information and continued to correspond via Internet messaging services downloaded by the victim at Ballantyne’s direction.

Ballantyne, who allegedly used a false name of John Baldwin while communicating with the victim, sent nude photographs of himself to the victim and received partially nude, sexually suggestive photographs of the victim. The complaint alleges that Ballantyne was very demanding during phone conversations with the minor victim and persuaded the victim to engage in sexual activity while they conversed.

Ballantyne allegedly blocked his number on multiple occasions when he called the victim and continually requested that the victim delete his pictures, text messages, and e-mails. Ballantyne communicated often during the latter part of January 2012 and allegedly told the victim not to tell anyone about their relationship, according to the complaint. In addition, the complaint details messages Ballantyne sent to the victim wherein he expresses his love for the victim and describes “how lucky” he was that the victim was “in his life.”

On March 1, a federal search warrant was executed at Ballantyne’s residence for evidence of child pornography. During the search, Ballantyne admitted to agents that he had been communicating with the minor since January 2012 and that he had received sexually explicit images from the victim, as well as having received sexually explicit images from another minor female he met online approximately two years prior, identified in the complaint as “CV2.” The complaint further alleges that Ballantyne admitted to traveling 180 miles to have sex with a third minor victim, identified in the complaint as “CV3,” whom he met in an online chat room. Ballantyne admitted to maintaining contact with both CV2 and CV3.

Based on evidence obtained during the search of Ballantyne’s home and further investigation, detectives and agents believe that Ballantyne may have had access to other minors not yet identified, and are distributing his photo to seek information as to whether additional victims exist. Ballantyne is a former middle school teacher in San Bernardino, California. At this time, there is no evidence suggesting Ballantyne had illegal contact with children at the school where he was employed; however, the investigation is continuing and the San Bernardino Unified School District is cooperating.

San Bernardino Bail Bonds Company: Currently the defendant has three charges against him. If they offer bail for him, according to the PC codes and bail schedule for california, it’ll be around $225,000. The code, PC 288.4(a)(2) is for; “Arrange meeting with Minor for purpose of exposing or procuring sexual exposure”, is $75K, PC 288.4(b) “Attend an arranged meeting with minor for purpose of exposing or procuring sexual exposure or engaging in lewd act” is $75K and an additional charge of PC 288.4(a)(2) for $75K, totaling $225,000. Now, the judge might rule differently and while the defendant is in jail, additional evidence might be found which will bring more charges against the defendant, hence raising the bail.

For a bail set at $225K the defendant has a couple of choices. One; post the entire bail amount in cash to the court and the defendant will get the entire amount back when the case is finished. Two; use a bail bonds company to secure bail. When using a bail bonds company, the defendant pays the company 10% of the total bail which is a non-refundable fee. In this case that would be $22,500. The bail agent will also ask for collateral for a bail this size. The collateral will have to be worth close to $225K, for example; a house with $225K of equity in it.

Anyone with information about this case, or the unreported victimization of minors, is urged to contact the FBI at 888-226-8443.

Ballantyne will have an initial appearance before a federal magistrate in U.S. District Court in Riverside this afternoon, currently scheduled at 3:00 p.m.

If convicted, Ballantyne faces a statutory maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison.

This investigation was conducted by the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office; detectives with the South Brunswick, New Jersey, Police Department; and the FBI’s New Jersey Cybercrimes Task Force. The San Bernardino County Unified School District provided assistance and is cooperating with the investigation.

Ballantyne will be prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office.

A criminal complaint contains allegations that a defendant has committed a crime. Every defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

Fake Bomb at Moorpark Police Station

Ventura Bail Bonds

According to the Moorpark Police there was a placement of a facsimile explosive device at the Moorpark Police Station located at 610 Spring Rd, Moorpark CA.

The suspect who placed the fake bomb was still in the area and also made the 911 call, his name is Jorque Loza and has a bail set at $250,000. The bail amount is the result of two charges; threatening a police officer and placing a fake bomb. Our Ventura Bail Bonds office explains the cost of working with a bail bonds company for bail in the amount of $250,000.

Ventura Bail Bonds

Ventura Bail Bonds

The cost of working with a bail bonds company is actually a fee or premium. Its similar to working with someone who does loans. They usually take a percentage of the loan total. A bail bondsman takes a 10% fee of the total bail. This fee is standard and all ethical bail bondsman charge this fee because its regulated by the California Department of Insurance. 10% of $250K is $25K. Therefore Loza or the indemnitor that signs for him will need to come up with $25K. This fee can be paid by cash, check or charge, normally.

A bail amount of $250K will require a sizeable collateral. Normally a bail bondsman likes to take property with enough equity in it to cover the total bail amount. For example; if the defendant or indemnitor has a house worth $500K and there’s $250K of equity, that would be a good choice for collateral. In some scenarios bail agents may take a large sum of money for collateral, say $50K plus the fee of $25K. But in this case the bail agent would probably seek additional indemnitors.

On March 3, 2012, at 1200 PM, the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office received an anonymous 911 call stating a suspicious package had been placed in front of the Moorpark Police Station. Deputies from the Moorpark Police responded and located a bottle containing a liquid, and a threatening note. Deputies cordoned off the area and called for technicians from the Sheriff’s Bomb Squad and the Ventura County Fire Department HazMat. The technicians determined the bottle was a facsimile explosive device and was not dangerous.

The investigation revealed that the subject who placed the call to 911 had also placed the device. Deputies quickly checked the area and located him. Jorque Loza was arrested for 148.1(d) PC / Placing a Facsimile Explosive Device and 69 PC / Threatening an Officer. He was booked into the Pre-Trial Detention Facility on $250,000 bail.

Ex-Marine Accused of Exporting Sensitive Military Items

A retired Marine Corps staff sergeant, who until recently worked in the Marine Aviation Supply Office at Edwards Air Force Base, was arrested by federal agents this morning following an undercover probe that allegedly revealed he lied to the government as part of a scheme to sell sensitive military equipment to buyers around the globe.

Sean Elias Sayegh, 41, of Rosamond, was taken into custody at his residence by agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).

His bail amount is not released. Our Van Nuys Bail Bonds office believes that Sayegh might even be held without bail. Being held without bail means just that, the defendant is remanded to jail either until their, arraignment, court date, or even for the length of the trial.

If there was bail for this defendant, it would probably be set very high considering the charges against him. Each count against him carries a bail amount and he has 4 counts. Each count probably has a bail of $100K therefore the total bail could be $400K and our bail agents believe it is probably higher than that, most likely $1M total.

To work with a bail bonds company, the defendant pays a 10% fee, for $1m bail that would be $100K. This fee is regulated by the California Department of Insurance. Since the defendant is making money from the crimes, a judge would likely place a PC 1275.1 hold to make sure that the monies come from legal sources.

Sayegh, who retired from the Marine Corps in December 2011, was named in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury last Friday that charges him with four counts of making false statements. Specifically, the indictment alleges that on four occasions Sayegh made fraudulent claims on U.S. Postal Service customs declaration forms, stating that packages he was shipping contained camera lenses and other camera equipment, when the items were actually laser light interference filters (LIFs). The alleged violations, which occurred between December 2009 and February 2010, involved the shipment of more than 100 LIFs.

LIFs, which are used with military night vision goggles, are on the U.S. Munitions List and cannot legally be exported without a license issued by the Department of State. LIFs protect the optics inside night vision goggles from being damaged by lasers. The technology is considered sufficiently sensitive that the military requires that LIFs be destroyed when they reach the end of their service life.

The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) initiated the probe into Sayegh’s activities after receiving a lead about the possible sale of Munitions List items on eBay. DCIS referred the matter to the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). HSI joined the investigation, at the request of NCIS, because of the potential export violations. HSI carried out the undercover investigation.

Each false statement charge in the indictment carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. Therefore, if he is convicted of the four counts in the indictment, Sayegh would face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, as well as a $1 million fine.

Sayegh is expected to be arraigned on the indictment this afternoon in United States District Court in Los Angeles.

“These items may look innocuous, but their sophistication makes them highly sought after by our adversaries,” said Claude Arnold, special agent in charge for HSI Los Angeles. “They were developed to give America and its allies a strategic military advantage, which is why HSI will continue to work with its law enforcement partners to ensure such technology doesn’t fall into the wrong hands.”

Jeffrey Morrow, special agent in charge for NCIS’ Southwest Field Office, stated, “One of the U.S. military’s greatest advantages is its ability to operate effectively at night when our adversaries cannot. In large part, this advantage is reliant on equipment and technologies like former-SSGT Sayegh attempted to sell to unauthorized buyers abroad. Actions like this risk the technological advantage that the U.S. military maintains and for this reason this case is significant. NCIS will work aggressively with our law enforcement partners to stop the compromise of these important technologies.”

Chris Hendrickson, special agent in charge, DCIS, Western Field Office, commented, “DCIS will use all tools available—our ability to track worldwide financial dealings, our advanced cyber capabilities, and our worldwide law enforcement alliances—to protect America’s warfighters and the taxpayers’ interests. DCIS and its law enforcement partners are committed to identifying and bringing to justice individuals intent on illegally exporting this country’s critical assets at the expense of America’s security.”

In addition to HSI, NCIS, and DCIS, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also played a prominent role in the case.

“This type of offense is unjustifiable,” said B. Bernard Ferguson, inspector in charge for the Los Angeles Division of the Postal Inspection Service. “U.S. Postal Inspectors will continue to aggressively investigate those who violate the laws meant to protect the Postal Service, its employees, and our nation’s citizens.”

In November 2009, the government announced the Export Control Initiative to streamline the complex system of U.S. export controls and enhance the coordination of efforts to address current security threats. As part of those ongoing reforms, HSI recently established the Long Beach-based Counter Proliferation Investigations Center (CPIC). CPICs are located in strategic cities where the threat of illegal exportations is greatest. The goal of these centers is to better facilitate regional enforcement efforts to target the illegal exportation of sensitive weapons and technology. In addition to DCIS, NCIS, USPIS, and CBP, other federal agencies currently participating in the HSI-led initiative include the Department of Commerce’s Office of Export Enforcement; the Air Force Office of Special Investigations; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; the FBI; and the National Aeronautics Space Agency (NASA) Office of Inspector General. The center enables the participating agencies to pool their resources, expertise, and intelligence to pursue cases involving export enforcement.

Contact: Assistant United States Attorney William A. Crowfoot
National Security Section
(213) 894-4465

Eluding Suspect Points Handgun at Los Angeles Police

Officers were attempting to stop for a traffic violator on a bicycle who failed to stop and instead tried to get away from police before turning and pointing a handgun at officers, resulting in an officer involved shooting.

On March 2, 2012, around 10:40 p.m., Metropolitan Division Police Officers working a crime suppression detail, in full uniform and driving a police vehicle in Harbor Division saw a man riding a bicycle at night with no lights. They attempted to stop the violator, (later identified as 24-year-old Julien Gonzales), for a traffic infraction of ‘Riding without Lights During Hours of Darkness’.

Gonzales failed to stop for the officers, got off his bike and began walking quickly away from them. He removed a handgun from his waistband and pointed it at the officers. An officer involved shooting occurred and Gonzales was struck by gunfire.

Gonzales was taken into custody and the Los Angeles Fire Department Paramedics responded and pronounced Gonzales dead at scene.

One of the officers injured his knee seeking cover to avoid being shot by Gonzales. The officer was transported to a local hospital where he was treated and later released.

A handgun was recovered at the scene.

If the suspect had not died at the scene, he would have been charged with attempted murder or something similar to that. And since he pulled the gun on officers, there probably wouldn’t have been any bail bonds. Our Van Nuys bail bonds company has never bailed out anyone from the Van Nuys Jail that has pulled a gun on an officer.

The LAPD Force Investigation Division responded to the incident and will conduct a thorough investigation of the officer-involved shooting and all related crimes. The investigation will ultimately be reviewed by the Chief of Police, the Office of the Inspector General and Board of Police Commissioners for compliance with the Department’s use-of-force policy which states that an officer’s use-of-force actions must be objectively reasonable.

Anyone with information about this incident is urged to call the FID at (213) 486-5230. During non-business hours or on weekends, calls should be directed to 1-877-LAPD-24-7 (877-527-3247). Anyone wishing to remain anonymous should call Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS (800-222-8477). Tipsters may also contact Crime Stoppers by texting to phone number 274637 (C-R-I-M-E-S on most keypads) with a cell phone. All text messages should begin with the letters “LAPD.” Tipsters may also go to LAPDOnline.org, click on “webtips” and follow the prompts.

California Investor Pleads Guilty to Fraud at Public Foreclosure Auctions

Sacramento Bail Bonds

SACRAMENTO, CA—A real estate investor pleaded guilty today in U.S. District Court in Sacramento to conspiring to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions held in San Joaquin County, Calif., Sharis A. Pozen, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, and Benjamin B. Wagner, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California, announced.

Wiley C. Chandler pleaded guilty to conspiring with a group of real estate speculators who agreed to rig bids and commit mail fraud when purchasing selected properties at public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Joaquin County. The goals of the conspiracies were to suppress and restrain competition, to fraudulently obtain selected real estate at noncompetitive prices and to divert money to coconspirators that would have gone to the beneficiaries, the department said in court papers.

According to the court documents, after the conspirators’ designated bidder bought a property at a public auction, they would hold a second, private auction, at which each participating conspirator would bid the amount above the public auction price he or she was willing to pay. The conspirator who bid the highest amount at the end of the private auction won the property. The difference between the price at the public auction and that at the second auction was the group’s illicit profit. The illicit profit was divided among the conspirators in payoffs. According to Chandler’s plea agreement, the conspiracies began at least early as September 2008 and continued until at least October 2009.

To date, 10 individuals, including Chandler, have pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in connection with the investigation. They are: Anthony B. Ghio; John R. Vanzetti; Theodore B. Hutz; Richard W. Northcutt; Yama Marifat; Gregory L. Jackson; Walter Daniel Olmstead; Robert Rose; and Kenneth A. Swanger.

Chandler was indicted by a federal grand jury in Sacramento on Dec. 7, 2011 with three investors—Andrew B. Katakis, Donald M. Parker and Anthony B. Joachim—and one auctioneer, W. Theodore Longley. Trial dates for these individuals have yet to be set.

“The Antitrust Division will continue to cooperate with its law enforcement partners to bring to justice those who undermine the competitive market for foreclosed properties and harm consumers,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Pozen.

“Public auctions are meant for the public, not for an elite group conspiring together for their own profit,” U.S. Attorney Wagner stated. “The prosecution of these defendants is necessary to protect the integrity of the housing market.”

Chandler pleaded guilty to bid rigging, a violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine. Chandler also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

These charges arose from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation of fraud and bidding irregularities in certain real estate auctions in San Joaquin County. The investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Field Office, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California, the FBI’s Sacramento Division and the San Joaquin County District Attorney’s Office. Trial attorneys Anna Pletcher and Tai Milder from the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Field Office and Assistant U.S. Attorney Russell L. Carlberg are prosecuting the case.

The crimes that were committed here have various bail amounts, but they all have something in common. The judge would most likely put PC 1275.1 holds on the bail amounts. A PC 1275.1 hold is when a judge requires the defendant and the Sacramento bail bonds company they are working with to prove the legitimacy of where the funds came from. In other words, they could not pay for the bail from monies they gained by partaking in the crimes they were arrested for or any crimes for that matter. All funds would be analyzed for legitimacy by court officials and others including individuals hired by the defendant’s lawyers.

Sacramento Bail Bonds

Sacramento Bail Bonds

 

Today’s charges are part of efforts underway by President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. One component of the task force is the national Mortgage Fraud Working Group, co-chaired by U.S. Attorney Wagner. For more information on the task force, visit www.StopFraud.gov.

Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Field Office at 415-436-6660, visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm, contact the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California at 916-554-2700 or contact the FBI’s Sacramento Division at 916-481-9110.

Switch to our mobile site